Night & some random B&W Photos

Hey,

Im just finishing to work through all the photos from the USA-trip in May. It’s been a lot of work, but finally I’m pretty close to the final selection of pictures. These are some, that I just wanted to post. no greater context, except loving the 28-105D lens. ;-).

Enjoy & take care,

Jimi

Night / St. Mark’s Place / Nikon D600 / Nikkor Af 50 1.8D / ISO 5000 / RAW / Lightroom

Robert F. Wagner. Sr. Place / NYC / Nikon D600 / Nikkor AF 28-105D / ISO 200 / Lightroom / RAW

Subway NYC / Nikon D600 / Nikkor 28-105D / ISO 2500 / RAW / Lightroom

Meatpacking District NYC / Nikon D600 / Nikkor AF 28-105D / RAW / Lightroom

a Man Boston / Nikon D600 / Nikkor 28-105D / ISO 200 / RAW / Lightroom

Walking Boston / Nikon D600 / Nikkor AF 28-105D / ISO 200 / RAW / Lightroom

Tags: bar, black, Boston, digital photography, Lightroom, meatpacking district nyc, New York, New York City, night, Nikkor AF 28-105D, Nikkor Af 50 1.8D, Nikon, Nikon D600, NYC, Photography, st mark's place, street photography, subway, travel, USA, walking boston

6 thoughts on “Night & some random B&W Photos”

Adrian Lewis on 14/08/2013 at 17:21 said:

Hi Jimi, good set of pictures! I particularly like the 2nd and 3rd down. And its great to see you going up to 5,000 ISO – do it, my friend, throw caution to the wind and just do it!!! 🙂

A versatile lens for urban and many other genres is the 24-120 VR Nikkor – there’s a new one out now and its a bit dear but I’ve got the older, cheaper one. In general, think about VR Nikkors – the Vibration Reduction really does work, it provides an extra 3 or 4 stops before a tripod is needed. Adrian

Reply ↓
- Jimi on 16/08/2013 at 13:01 said:
  
  Hi Adrian, thank you, I’ glad you like them. The third one is my favourite. 😉
  I know the VR lenses are good and I’m seriously thinking on getting one, just need to save some money. 😉
  Which VR lenses did you use so far, beside the 70-300?
  Jimi
  
  Reply ↓
  - Adrian Lewis on 18/08/2013 at 12:32 said:
    
    Most of my Nikkors are VR – 16-35, 105 macro (superb for portraits too, wonderful lens!), 80-400, 24-120. I use the 70-300 most – it can do no wrong in my eyes! But for your kind of photography, i.e. around cities etc, I wonder if the 24-120 might not be better, because it has that very useful mix of wideangle and short telephoto >>> but it depends on how you “see” your pictures – do you ever “see” in wideangle? I have the older version of the 24-120VR – as long as you get it from a reputable dealer so that it has a guarantee / warranty, then an older version one like mine would be cheaper than the new f4 version. Adrian
Luddy's Lens on 29/08/2013 at 14:03 said:

I loooove the geometrics you captured in the brick building! Very nice set.

Reply ↓
H.O on 31/08/2013 at 19:01 said:

I like 2nd one.

Reply ↓
Hannah Ezra on 14/11/2013 at 19:50 said:

I absolutely adore the second shot. Fantastic lines.

Reply ↓